Winning Ways: transforming healthcare using IT
I am a big fan of Idries Shah’s tales of the Sufi wisdom of Mulla Nasrudin. Here is one of my favourites:
One night a neighbour found Nasrudin down on his knees looking for something under the street light: "What have you lost, Mulla?""My key," said Nasrudin.
After a few minutes of searching, the other man said: "Where did you drop it?"
"By my house."
"Then why, for heaven's sake, are you looking here?"
"There is more light here."
A veteran of a Hospital Process Redesign, I remain an advocate of transforming healthcare with IT. So, I enjoyed consultant vascular surgeon Simon Dodds’ book Three Wins, which recounts his experience at the Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, UK of developing the Leg Ulcer Telemedicine (LUTM) Service.
Leg ulcers mainly affect the elderly, and the annual costs of treatment are in the region of £600m. The high cost is mainly due to the need for redressing by community nurses.
LUTM is a secure electronic clinical-record system that allows the storage and processing of colour images. Community nurses use LUTM software to monitor the colour and size of ulcers from the digital images. Measurements over time can assess the effectiveness of treatment and allow future management to be planned. Nurses can also refer a patient to a specialist, transferring images at the same time.
Furthermore, a randomized trial showed using the LUTM system reduced the time from referral to attendance at an outpatient clinic and improved rates of healing at 12 and 24 weeks.
Impressive stuff!
Simon’s approach to change is closer to the “harder” end of systems-based change methods. I would like to have read more on the human dynamics of process changes, which I have found to be the most challenging.
He does spend time explaining how Belbin’s roles apply to the various stages of transformation and explaining Maslow and Herzberg’s theories of motivation.
However, as someone who sits uncomfortably between a Plant, a Shaper and a Monitor-Evaluator by Belbin’s reckoning, I am sceptical of categorisation as a tool.
I am similarly uneasy when it comes to theories of motivation. Herzberg’s theory is attractive in its simplicity, but his conclusions were based on samples selected from engineers and scientists, and, therefore, may not be applicable to the kaleidoscopic variety of workers in the NHS. I like models of motivation as a starting point, but to treat everyone as an individual.
The study shows impressive improvements in patient care, but I would be interested in hearing from Simon if he thinks the well known Hawthorne Effect* may have played a part, because it would have been impossible to blind nurses to the fact they were using LUTM.
But enough management speak. Despite my reservations on how well the method would apply on a large scale, Three Wins is a book for inspiration and practical application.
Simon Dodds and team have spread their light on a specific area of the NHS and systematically improved it. Other areas remain in darkness. But the key is out there for those who look for it: systematic soft change underpinned by hard IT.
*The Hawthorne effect - an increase in worker productivity produced by the psychological stimulus of being singled out and made to feel important.

The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) is developing a standard specification for patient wristbands in the NHS in England and Wales. This second phase of work follows from earlier guidance issued in November 2005 and reported in
Now I am a sucker for a cute gadget, especially one finished in black and silver that combines telephony and wireless. No surprise then that I spotted the
Political and technological winds of change whistle through NHS Connecting for Health's National Programme for IT (NPfIT). They may erode the notion of a single, comprehensive, monolithic system serving GPs and acute, community and mental health care settings and deposit the spores of innovation, clinical inspiration and supplier diversification.
The £6bn NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT) is the biggest computer project ever, if some healthcare pundits are to be believed. I have news for them. Mine may be bigger.
